Towards the title and subject of my end of year essay.

Since the task of the essay has been appointed to the Sound Arts course, I have glided across multiple field of study to research without any luck of consolidating a unique and direct topic to question. This struggle comes from my intention and goal for this essay to be only focus in a single topic, preventing any derail from the question and properly attempt a solid specific work. Even-though I have an inner conflict in the specifics of my research, I have already decided the macro subjects that I want to investigate and analyse. Because of our recent lectures of Contemporary Issues in Sound Arts, I was inspired to analyse a live sound practice through the fields of epistemology, ecology and subjectivity. This inspiration specially sprouted after reading Steven Feld’s text Acoustemology, that discusses acoustic phenomena in conjunction to epistemology as a new field of study, bringing up concepts as relational ontology in the active process of acoustics being a form of experience.

Furthermore I have decided that focusing in only one live sound practice is not enough to create a concise analysis of the macro topics I chose, and thus I expand my focus in to two live sound practices that have a relational affect to each other. By choosing two live sound practices and their affect to each other, I more accurately explore the concept of relational ontology, within acoustemology.

With out any relevance to the course, I’ve been reading one of Sociology most important texts and pillars, Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism. Where Weber argues that early Calvinism and its values are a mayor force towards the creation of capitalism. This made me think of the early origins of the western music practice, such as medieval christian church music and the sound practice within mass. The momentum of that thought opened my mind to the possible idea that just as how Calvinism impulsed the creation of capitalism, early christian church sound practice impulsed the unspoken rules and tradition of contemporary live sound practices and performances, both aesthetically and conceptually.

Above is a quick draft I made about possible topics and points will undertake in my essay. On the left I wrote a possible question for the essay to answer, and then I deconstructed the question to focus in definition of the specific words I used. In the deconstruction of my question I also noted the conceptual weaknesses, that can weaken the discourse of my essay. For exampled under contemporary sound culture I draw a line down where I ask myself if I mean sound arts or music, the wideness of the two different media’s make my essay question less specific and precise. On the right I have divided into three the concepts and themes I will guide the analysis of my essay with, Epistemology, Ecology and The Individual (the subjective).

The next step towards consolidating the title and topic of my essay is to choose specific case studies to analyse. For example I have to specify the christian religious live sound practice, and chose a contemporary live sound practice to demonstrate the church affect on it.

Felisha Ledesma

Berlin based sound artist and practitioner, focused in installation work and gallery performances. Generative compositions and performances are a common medium or her exhibitions, intersecting these techniques with other sound cultures as noise music. Ledesma’s work has an origin in Portland in the US, with organising both raves and underground gigs and sound exhibitions.

Her work revolves a lot through synthesis, from plug-ins to hardware. Ledesma has hosted multiple synth workshops, giving people access with complex equipment like modular synthesisers. The workshops later became a collective where different performances and events where taken place. Artist where invited for residency in their studio to explore the equipment and record performances. Artist such as Moor Mother performed in the events, the recognition of the collective made brands donate gear to their studio and later collaborate in workshops with that equipment. Her work in synth workshop lead her to work in a feminist synth library in LA, contributing in curation of events and documentation of female lead synth work.

AMQR is a software synthesiser created by Ledesma and fellow sound artist Ess Mattison. Ledesma used this tool to create her second release ‘Fringe’ , creating her own sound for her own composition. The synth objective is to blend between electric and the acoustic, being in the luminance of both timbral spectrums. The name AMQR is inspired in the new sensational phenomenon ASMR, the synth was created to mirror the affect of an ASMR experience. The success of AMQR led Ledesma to start producing new synths, in particular made in Max Msp, and sell them. She also uses this synths and plug-ins in her performances, with the purpose of testing the plug-ins and explore their limitations.

Above is a song of the Ledesma album ‘Fringe’, as mentioned before this album is weirdly hybrid between electronic and non electronic timbre. As a low quality digital picture, this album sounds possibly real but the tiny distortion of the electronic medium twist the expression of the composition. I admire the ability of Ledesma of creating her own sonic tool, modern music of sound art is widely connected to the sonic tools used in the composition, using unique tools create unique compositions making her composition extremely personal.

Pamela Z

Pamela Z works varies across mediums, shifting from music composition to sound arts, and sometimes dealing with visual media and animation. Her compositions are commonly characterised by complex sampling and looping techniques, using Max Msp and sensors to build melodic material and then improvise with it. In the visiting practitioner lecture she explain that her instrument is a collaboration of voice with the computer, where she manipulate her voice with digital processes to create a specific aesthetic. Lately she has also used sensors and video input to manipulate her voice and music, for example she would wear sensors in her hands and then with expressive movements modulate the sound to mirror her movements.

As movement or dance is an important building block for her compositions, she has also shifted into doing live performance art. Collaborating with professional dancers as buto dancers and opera practitioners. Then she uses digital technology to join all the collaborators in an interactive media. The extensive use of loops make her compositions extremely minimalistic and trance inducing, she creates a continuing pulse that creates an attractive rhythm to the audience.

Pamela Z has also indulge into digital installations and sound sculptures. She used common items of life and modulated them with digital information. For example she had a baggage X-Ray machine, like the ones used in an airport, where visitor could put there own bags and items. But this X-ray machine was coded to show items that where not in the bag, specifically things prohibited in an airport, like guns and knifes. Creating a quite ironic and paradoxic piece. I also thought that the interactivity of the piece made a great relationship between visitor and piece.

Interviews are widely used in Pamela Z’s creative process. Before starting any new project, Pamela Z searches individuals to interview about relevant artistic themes or non related topics. She records these interviews and uses them for both inspiration and as a mouldable primary source for art pieces. Her piece Memory Trace (2012) uses a collage of multiple interviews she did to people about memory, and create a narrative connecting parallelism between the answers of the subjects of the interviews. I though this piece was both conceptually pleasing, due to the narrative of the piece and aesthetically pleasing, portraying voice in a very satisfying matter, developed by rhythm and repetition. Later in 2013 Pamela Z developed this idea of using interviews as sonic motifs, by composing a hybrid piece combining a string quartet and a collage of different interviews discussing the place of birth of the interview subjects. The mixture between interview and quartet music created a weirdly pleasing juxtaposition, where both interview and music had different objectives but joint together created an external effect.